Me, Myself, and I

  1. quimbycub:

willow-wanderings:

nedahoyin:

queenqueerqutie:


Martin Bauendahl

Real life vs Societal expectations

Wow..

Yeah, news flash people, boobs generally only look “perky” while in a bra. A few are super lucky and have naturally perky boobs, most don’t. And this is because, SURPRISE, boobs are intended to feed babies and it’s hard for a baby being cradled in mum’s arm to reach a nipple that’s on the other side of the boob from where its mouth is.Think of a soda fountain machine. The spouts are all pointing down, right? So you can put soda in a cup being held under the spout? If the spout was sticking straight out, it would be really hard to get a soda out of it.Babies need to be able to reach a nipple easily so they can eat. Ergo, nipples are usually lower and angled more downward on a naturally hanging boob, both so it’s easier for a baby to reach and so gravity can do its part in pulling milk toward the nipple.So there you go, outright ANATOMICAL proof that boobs are not there for the benefit of men.

Thank you for that. I never realized. Thanks.

    quimbycub:

    willow-wanderings:

    nedahoyin:

    queenqueerqutie:

    Martin Bauendahl

    Real life vs Societal expectations

    Wow..

    Yeah, news flash people, boobs generally only look “perky” while in a bra. A few are super lucky and have naturally perky boobs, most don’t. And this is because, SURPRISE, boobs are intended to feed babies and it’s hard for a baby being cradled in mum’s arm to reach a nipple that’s on the other side of the boob from where its mouth is.

    Think of a soda fountain machine. The spouts are all pointing down, right? So you can put soda in a cup being held under the spout? If the spout was sticking straight out, it would be really hard to get a soda out of it.

    Babies need to be able to reach a nipple easily so they can eat. Ergo, nipples are usually lower and angled more downward on a naturally hanging boob, both so it’s easier for a baby to reach and so gravity can do its part in pulling milk toward the nipple.
    So there you go, outright ANATOMICAL proof that boobs are not there for the benefit of men.

    Thank you for that. I never realized. Thanks.

    (Source: denicedenice, via we-all-share-one-moon)

  2. subalh:

    Straight allies literally feel more sympathy for and are way more protective of a straight person getting upset because they feel sorry for us than the actual people they are feeling sorry for and that is why pretty much every one of you is 100% useless

    (via theafrocentricnihilist)

  3. boundunbound:

p0kemina:

quimbycub:

willow-wanderings:

nedahoyin:

queenqueerqutie:


Martin Bauendahl

Real life vs Societal expectations

Wow..

Yeah, news flash people, boobs generally only look “perky” while in a bra. A few are super lucky and have naturally perky boobs, most don’t. And this is because, SURPRISE, boobs are intended to feed babies and it’s hard for a baby being cradled in mum’s arm to reach a nipple that’s on the other side of the boob from where its mouth is.Think of a soda fountain machine. The spouts are all pointing down, right? So you can put soda in a cup being held under the spout? If the spout was sticking straight out, it would be really hard to get a soda out of it.Babies need to be able to reach a nipple easily so they can eat. Ergo, nipples are usually lower and angled more downward on a naturally hanging boob, both so it’s easier for a baby to reach and so gravity can do its part in pulling milk toward the nipple.So there you go, outright ANATOMICAL proof that boobs are not there for the benefit of men.

Thank you for that. I never realized. Thanks.

Wake up call.(Pornography is not valid sex education)

I never thought about the baby thing. Of course.

    boundunbound:

    p0kemina:

    quimbycub:

    willow-wanderings:

    nedahoyin:

    queenqueerqutie:

    Martin Bauendahl

    Real life vs Societal expectations

    Wow..

    Yeah, news flash people, boobs generally only look “perky” while in a bra. A few are super lucky and have naturally perky boobs, most don’t. And this is because, SURPRISE, boobs are intended to feed babies and it’s hard for a baby being cradled in mum’s arm to reach a nipple that’s on the other side of the boob from where its mouth is.

    Think of a soda fountain machine. The spouts are all pointing down, right? So you can put soda in a cup being held under the spout? If the spout was sticking straight out, it would be really hard to get a soda out of it.

    Babies need to be able to reach a nipple easily so they can eat. Ergo, nipples are usually lower and angled more downward on a naturally hanging boob, both so it’s easier for a baby to reach and so gravity can do its part in pulling milk toward the nipple.
    So there you go, outright ANATOMICAL proof that boobs are not there for the benefit of men.

    Thank you for that. I never realized. Thanks.

    Wake up call.

    (Pornography is not valid sex education)

    I never thought about the baby thing. Of course.

    (Source: denicedenice, via nightinthewoods)

  4. thegreenwolf:

    kronos-keeper:

    tinaconte:

    underscorex:

    mma-gifs:

    Sport Science S02E11: World’s Toughest Woman (June/21/2009)

    "Gina can land all 8 blows in a blistering 3 seconds. And how much does this maelstrom combine to generate? An amazing 4,800 pounds of force. That’s like a North Pacific giant octopus pounding you with all 8 of it’s arms. Translation: In 3 seconds, Gina could brake your ribs, give you a concussion, shatter your nose, rupture your spleen, cause internal bleeding, and put you down for the count."

    but women can’t be superheroes

    I want to be her.

    ALWAYS WANTED TO KNOW THIS SHIT. 

    Also proves that yes, women CAN fight back, if we just learn how. Too often we’re told to sit down, shut up, don’t resist. But look at what you can do—and you don’t even have to be as ripped as she is. Maybe you don’t have 400lb of force behind your elbow—but you still probably have a pretty significant amount, enough to hurt someone. And a lot of self-defense is about technique, not just force—any of these moves she’s showing would do damage even if you’re like me, tiny and not especially muscular. 

    We’ve learned that our bodies are meant to be acted upon and that we must be passive. Bullshit. We are just as capable of being not just defensive, but aggressive. We can undo the conditioning that keeps us from acting, even if our bodies are able, and we can learn to see our bodies as weapons for when we need them to be as such. We can learn to do the same things she’s doing, in body and in resolve.

    (I do realize that physical disability can make some or all of these things difficult to impossible. If this describes you, there are some efforts to make self-defense options for those with limited mobility/etc. Examples include the International Disabled Self-Defense Association, Criptaedo, and wheelingdragon’s videos on Shaolin Kempo for physically disabled people.)

  5. dankotaxvx:

    oh yeah when you find out someones some kind of gay dont ask them “what did your family think?” because we probably dont want to talk about it

    (via theafrocentricnihilist)

  6. (via jessgoesnuclear)

  7. letsmakeourownfairytale:

    #favourite harry potter headcanons

    (via jessgoesnuclear)

  8. “I spent like 10 years of my life pretending to fly around on a broomstick and you’re asking me if preparing for a love scene was ‘tricky’ because the other person also had a penis?”
    Daniel Radcliffe (via hankgreensmoustache)

    (via ohremus)

  9. doctorwhothefuckareyou:

    kailivesinabox:

    in french we don’t say “i love you”, we say “vous recevez une heure supplémentaire dans la piscine à balles” which roughly translates to “you are my sun, my stars, my everything” and i think that’s beautiful

    image

    image

    um 

    (via jessgoesnuclear)